1. Exactly what do Glucose Daters Do Together with her? Sex vs. Relationships
Brand new survey consisted of twenty-four small signed-concluded and you can quick discover-ended inquiries, including record variables. The former inquiries attained details about experiences out of financial exchanges, volume and you will number of times, market background, along with, eg, sex, ages, and you may intimate direction ( Dining table step 1), motivations having glucose relationships ( Table dos), and you will skills out of giving otherwise having fun with escort attributes. Most were hoping to find heterosexual plans, nevertheless heterosexual taste is actually more powerful among the men respondents (97 percent) than simply among women respondents (61 %). While the ages restriction to join up on the site try 18, 10% of the women reported getting more youthful than simply 18 (14–17) (discover Desk 1, Shape step 1 and you will Figure dos). six New open-finished inquiries treated new definitions and motivations up to sugar matchmaking. The newest interviews additionally the survey had been held inside the Swedish. Gunnarsson translated analysis to be cited toward English.
Both interview therefore the questionnaire analysis was in fact reviewed qualitatively. As the interviews data provided much more depth, the fresh survey analysis provided depth. Particular dimensions of new questionnaire study were examined quantitatively, for example, years, sex, and you can sexual positioning. Interview transcriptions and qualitative questionnaire solutions were canned inside NVivo using a mix of studies-driven and you can style-determined programming. The problem regarding ideas on how to classify sugar relationship (especially in reference to prostitution) together with issue of instrumental vs. intrinsic motivations was basically conceptually type in the programming procedure. Analytical memo hookup numbers near me Bunbury writing was applied in order to document designs and you can interesting templates while in the programming and additionally a far more alternative reading of your thing. According to research by the observance the thing represented all kinds out of techniques and you can skills, i searched for a way of categorizing such distinctions. It turned into obvious the knowledge didn’t vary along you to unmarried axis, so, in the place of separating her or him on that selection of categories (cf. Scull 2020), i chose to heart the research about three trick proportions one came up as the most definitive organizers of the differentiations: (1) New simple articles out of sugar relationship preparations: Precisely what do glucose daters do together with her? (2) Brand new types of settlement inside: Just how was “babies” settled? and you will (3) “Babies’” inspirational grounds for sugar relationship: As to what extent do they partake in the latest plan because of the material professionals otherwise because they see those activities in the and you can off themselves? From the after the, the fresh interviews and you can questionnaire research try examined jointly regarding some kinds of sugar relationships according to per distinguishing aspect. If at all possible, amounts are provided regarding the regularity of every classification certainly one of professionals. Notice, regardless of if, your numbers commonly fundamentally associate of your own greater populace regarding glucose daters, and therefore participants often cannot be neatly split into classes, because so many has actually a selection of more event together with concerns driving the data age bracket just weren’t designed to suits this article’s logical size.
The first dimension central getting differentiating ranging from styles of sugar relationship concerns the latest basic stuff of your own sugar matchmaking plan. The performing regarding glucose dating can be put into about three categories. In the 1st group, we find a mere sexual exchange; regarding next, “babies” and “daddies” was involved with a comprehensive dating plan also gender however, including other activities; from the 3rd, this new parties socialize when you look at the an internet dating-including trend, but gender is not an element of the plan.
50 % of the brand new “baby” interviewees (7 regarding fifteen) and one “daddy” interviewee (1 away from 9) equated sugar dating either for the quick exchanging out of intercourse, otherwise advertised having fun with sugar dating sites for this specific purpose, as the only way of using the site otherwise in general method and others. In the survey responses, 13 percent out of “baby” respondents and step 3 percent away from “daddy” participants unambiguously equated glucose matchmaking with prostitution or offering/to get gender. When inquired about benefits associated with glucose matchmaking compared to the other designs away from relationships, you to definitely survey respondent mentioned, “It is far from a kind of dating [smiley]; your sell and purchase intercourse” (“baby,” 28). A perennial motif about issue would be the fact glucose relationship is a glossy safety to have prostitution, as articulated from the several other survey respondent: “That is prostitution. We’re for the self-deception. No body folks really wants to name our selves hooker otherwise john. So we changed what and you can launched it from inside the a nicer package” (“child,” 25). So it rough feel about “the genuine nature” of sugar dating contrasts to your emphasis of earlier in the day browse to the just how sugar daters tend to delimit their work out of prostitution and you will gender work ( Chu and Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and could become about Swedish mass media, where sugar relationships just like the a pay to own prostitution could have been a good repeated theme ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).